With IT outsourcing on the rise, microsourcing is gaining attention as a way to cut operational costs, boost revenue, and reduce employee workload. But is it really the most effective approach?
The demand for skilled software engineers has never been higher. According to an Indeed survey, 86% of hiring managers and recruiters struggle to find and hire top tech talent. So, as you know, it is a competitive scenario for tech companies that need to look for a faster and cheaper solution of hiring talents to scale their product engineering team.
The global microsourcing industry is fueled by startups and small businesses, which account for over 60% of market revenue, according to the Crowdsourcing Industry Report. Startups alone contribute 39% of total industry revenue.
But is this model really efficient compared to the other outsourcing methods? Are there hidden costs of using this method on your Software Development Lifecycle? Keep reading this article to find out!
Would You Rather Listen Instead?
Tune in to our podcast episode on Microsourcing for a commented version.
What is Microsourcing?
Microsourcing is a cost-effective staffing strategy that allows businesses to delegate specific tasks or functions to specialized external professionals. Unlike traditional outsourcing, microsourcing focuses on small-scale, high-impact tasks, helping companies scale without excessive overhead costs.
Breaking up large projects into smaller projects enables a more agile approach for a quicker turnaround and better results at competitive pricing. Some examples of tasks commonly outsourced by micro sourcing are data entry and validation, image tagging, research, writing, editing, categorization, maintenance of databases, data back-up/recovery, and data protection.
Key Benefits of Microsourcing
- Lower operational costs without compromising quality.
- Faster project execution by leveraging specialized expertise.
- Reduced recruitment workload for HR and hiring managers.
- Increased efficiency through focused, task-based talent allocation.
Microsourcing is especially popular among SaaS companies, where agility, cost-effectiveness, and specialized talent play a crucial role in success. However, staff augmentation (talent-as-a-service) offers a more sustainable way to scale.
How Microsourcing Works
But how does it work? There are usually three key players:
- Job Providers: companies that outsource their jobs to micro sourcing platforms.
- Platforms: which mediate the micro-tasks between the job providers and the Micro workers
- Microworkers: who execute the micro-tasks
Interactions go somewhat like this:
Types of micro sourcing
- Model A: The ISSP (Impact Sourcing Service Providers) owns the outsourcing contract and interacts with the client. The ISSP delivers the service to the client, owns the outsourcing center, and manages local employees to perform the day-to-day outsourced tasks.
Model B: The ISSP owns the outsourcing contract and interacts with the client. However, the ISSP uses a sub-contractor to deliver the service and perform the day-to-day outsourced tasks. More than one sub-contractor can be used in this model. The ISSP retains overall accountability for the contract and service provision.
What are the differences between Microsourcing and Outsourcing?
Microsourcing is different from traditional outsourcing. You don’t hire one or two full-time employees. Instead, you leverage the special skill-set of numerous workers. Each person has one job to do for your business.
| Outsourcing | Microsourcing | |
| Costs | Low | Low |
| Long term costs | High | Varies |
| Process Expertise | High | Medium |
| Operational Flexibility | High | High |
| Operational Control | Low | Medium |
Microsourcing vs. Talent-as-a-Service: Which Is Better?
Microsourcing offers quick solutions for immediate gaps, but for long-term success, talent-as-a-service provides better integration, continuity, and retention.
| Feature | Microsourcing | Talent-as-a-Service (Staff Augmentation) |
| Scope | Task-specific | Long-term, integrated teams |
| Cost | Lower upfront | Cost-efficient, predictable rates |
| Flexibility | High | Higher—scales with business needs |
| Quality Control | Varies by provider | Direct oversight, seamless team integration |
| Common Use Cases | Customer service, software debugging, AI consulting | Full product development, scaling dev teams |
Why SaaS Companies Prefer Staff Augmentation Over Microsourcing
Microsourcing is useful for quick fixes, but for SaaS companies that require sustained growth and team stability, staff augmentation (nearshoring) is the smarter choice.
Advantages of Talent-as-a-Service:
- Access to pre-vetted experts without long recruitment cycles.
- Seamless integration into existing workflows.
- Scalability—expand or shrink your team based on workload.
- Lower turnover rates compared to short-term microsourcing.
- Cultural and time zone alignment for better collaboration.
Ubiminds specializes in nearshore software development, offering cost-effective, high-quality teams that grow with your business.
When to Use Microsourcing vs. Staff Augmentation
- You need a one-time project completed quickly.
- The task is highly specialized and doesn’t require long-term engagement.
- You’re managing multiple vendors and can handle coordination.
- You need ongoing expertise embedded in your team.
- You want dedicated engineers who integrate with your processes.
- You’re focused on long-term growth and team stability.
Ubiminds Talent-as-a-Service is the turnkey addition to your team.
What are The Strategic Reasons to Use Microsourcing?
The main reason to use a microsourcing strategy is to save money. Once you pay workers as a service (instead of paying a lump fee), it may seem like a great money-saving strategy.
In addition to that, research from the School of Information Management, Victoria University of Wellington (New Zealand), listed some advantages like the facility to delineate and divide the project into pieces and the possibility to run the project entirely online.
Hidden Costs and Risks of Microsourcing
While microsourcing reduces overhead, it comes with challenges.
Potential Risks:
- Lack of long-term commitment can impact continuity.
- Project management overhead increases with multiple providers.
- Quality control challenges due to varied skill levels.
How to Mitigate Risks:
✅ Choose reputable staff augmentation partners with proven track records.
✅ Set clear deliverables and performance metrics from day one.
✅ Use AI-driven project management tools for tracking progress.
A major hidden cost of microsourcing is the lack of skilled and experienced talent, which affects long-term sustainability. Companies often need to invest in additional training, project management, and quality control to make this model work.
That’s why also there is a need to develop skilled and experienced talents as well as project management and business development teams to support micro sourcing platforms. Therefore, there is a need to incentivize training and skilling of talents to ensure this method’s sustainability.
Final Thoughts: Why Talent-as-a-Service Is the Future
Microsourcing is a quick fix, but staff augmentation through talent-as-a-service is the smarter long-term strategy. SaaS companies looking for flexibility, reliability, and cost efficiency should consider nearshore staff augmentation over short-term microsourcing.
📞 Book a call with Ubiminds today to explore customized hiring solutions.
FAQs About Microsourcing and Staff Augmentation
International Marketing Leader, specialized in tech. Proud to have built marketing and business generation structures for some of the fastest-growing SaaS companies on both sides of the Atlantic (UK, DACH, Iberia, LatAm, and NorthAm). Big fan of motherhood, world music, marketing, and backpacking. A little bit nerdy too!
UbiNews
Subscribe now to receive our exclusive publications directly in your inbox.
